The harm review 场景学习单

A draft includes a private detail that makes the story vivid but does not change the verified public issue.

一份草稿包含一项令报道更生动的私人细节，却不影响已经核实的公共问题。

REPORTER

Readers will ask about the detail, and leaving it out may make the story feel incomplete.

读者会追问这个细节，删掉它可能让报道显得不完整。

EDITOR

Public curiosity is not the same as public interest.

公众好奇心并不等于公共利益。

EDITOR

State the public purpose, evidence strength, likely harm, privacy invasion, affected people, and whether a narrower description achieves the same purpose.

说明公共目的、证据强度、可能伤害、隐私侵扰、受影响者，以及范围更窄的描述能否实现同一目的。

REPORTER

We will remove the identifying detail, keep the verified institutional issue, and explain the boundary in the editor’s note.

我们会删除身份细节，保留已核实的制度问题，并在编辑说明中解释这条边界。

The story becomes less dramatic and more proportionate to the evidence and public purpose.

报道变得不那么戏剧化，却与证据和公共目的更加相称。